THE VIEW ON VICK
THE FANS HAVE SPOKEN!
Other than and almost equal to the Brett Favre situation, my question about Michael Vick flooded my mail box. And even though no's outweighed the yes count (by nearly 3 to 1), you had some great and strong opinions...so let's get right to it!
Frank Cifaldi: Maybe it's an attempt to light a fire under Brohm and Flynn or maybe he just thinks Vick should have another chance and teams shouldn't just automatically shut the door on him. Just leaving the door open with Vick could also change any negative perception Thompson may have with his own players and (potential free agents).
Terry Vey: Whoever signs Michael Vick will be putting their job on the line. Security will have to be beefed up.
Jim Badagliacco: He's not going to be a Packer. But f he's not signed, he'll be a distraction EVERY offseason until he is signed. YES to Vick in the NFL, NO to Vick on the pack's roster
Tracy Richardson Firgens: NO FREAKIN WAY!!!!!!! I'll be on the protesters side and boycotting everything packers if he becomes one of us!!!! I will be ashamed to live in wisconsin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Aaron Ebbinger: He's a big fat distraction the league doesnt need in my opinion.
Steve Winnicki: Easy fellas. Thompson said nothing, as usual. Vick won't be coming to GB anytime soon.
Pete Kolosick: I would rather have Cleo Lemon than Vick. Ted, what are you thinking?
Steve Spooner: I'd love it. Great wildcat option, better backup than what we have already. Get it done, and issue him jersey #4!
Larry Steinborn: This can't be right, are we now turning into the Oakland Raiders East? We need him like we need a dog fight promoter.
Jason Rudelich: He's better than both our back-ups undoubtably, and provides a great athlete. He should be on our roster already.
I have a vision problem...I don't see Vick with the Pack. But if you have more comments, feel free to blitz me again at firstname.lastname@example.org